CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6] — Page 223

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

221

efficiently

attracted attention, And that adverting

to tiens,

As well as to the special grounds which distinguish Capt. Wathina's Case from others, he is to be Allowed the benefit which to lay ago a dered in his favn of

a pecuniary payment in lieu of the rooms which he

formerly occupied.

PF.E

17 Sept

On the whole I think it more

was

for the benefit of the service that por Labouchere on uphold his own decision than that he and hold himsel

bound but what was not a

but rather an

on the part of

indication

decisio

of opinion

Lord J. Russell.

I would reply that Lord John Russell

quslision but reserved

did not give any i

it for the report which die J. I was instructed to Jumist – Sir W. Molesworth in a

Jurnish which relieved Capt walkins from portion of his duties

despatat

referred

5 Lord

John Russell's despatch of 23d June

but he does not appear to have intended to pronounce

any opinion of on the subject

Of that despatch

Mordabouchere in arsiony

the decision announced in his despatch of 18th March last fully considered the documents laid before him & he feels it necessary

to manitarni thi decision then deliberatif given

Ms 25 sept

Edit History

2026-05-18 03:01:19 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

221 efficiently attracted attention, And that adverting to tiens, As well as to the special grounds which distinguish Capt. Wathina's Case from others, he is to be Allowed the benefit which to lay ago a dered in his favn of a pecuniary payment in lieu of the rooms which he formerly occupied. PF.E 17 Sept On the whole I think it more was for the benefit of the service that por Labouchere on uphold his own decision than that he and hold himsel bound but what was not a but rather an on the part of indication decisio of opinion Lord J. Russell. I would reply that Lord John Russell quslision but reserved did not give any i 83 it for the report which die J. I was instructed to Jumist – Sir W. Molesworth in a Jurnish which relieved Capt walkins from portion of his duties despatat Q referred 5 Lord John Russell's despatch of 23d June but he does not appear to have intended to pronounce any opinion of on the subject Of that despatch Mordabouchere in arsiony ah the decision announced in his despatch of 18th March last fully considered the documents laid before him & he feels it necessary to manitarni thi decision then deliberatif given Ms 25 sept

Baseline (Original)

221 efficiently attracted attention, And that adverting to tiens, As well as to the special grands which distinguish Capt. Wathina' Case from others, he is to be Allowed the beneft which to lay ago a dered in his favn of a pecuniary payment in biew of the rooms which be formerly occupied. PF.E 17 Sept On the whole II think it more was for the benefit of the service that por Labouchere on uphold his own decision than that he and hold himsel bound but what was not a but rather an on the part of indication decisio of opinion Lord J. Rupell. I would reply. that Lord John Russell quslision but reserved did not give any i 83 it for the report which die J. I was instructed to Jumist – Sir W. Molesworth in a Jurnish which relieved Capt walkins from portion of his duties despatat Q referred 5 Lord John Rupell's despatch of 23d June but he does not appear to have intended to pronounce any opinion of on the subject Of that despatch Mordabouchere in arsiony ah the decision announced in his despatch of 18th March last fully considered the documents laid before him & he feels it necessary to manitarni thi decision then deliberatif given Ms 25 sept

2026-05-18 03:01:19 · Baseline

View content

221